Your application should be tailored to your
students and geared toward outcomes. You can use the rubric below to plan, evaluate,
and improve your classroom application. Notice that the last criterion
is quality
of your reflection on the development and effectiveness of your classroom
application.
| What
learning activities your students will participate in
|
4
Rating:
A hook
into the content that is exciting to students and that they
can see
immediate use for. |
3
Rating:
An engaging
introductory activity that provokes
students
curiosity. |
2
Rating:
A way to
identify and use existing student knowledge and interests for
knowledge
development. |
1
Rating:
An opportunity
for students to relate what they are learning to their lives
and interests. |
| Curriculum connections
|
4
Rating:
Integrates
ideas from different disciplines for systems
thinking. |
3
Rating:
Integrates
ideas from several areas through systems thinking. |
2
Rating:
Uses Earth
system science to focus on systems. |
1
Rating:
Connects
Earth, Life, and Physical science around Earth system
science. |
| Instructional
strategy
|
4
Rating:
Uses jigsaw
groups for cooperative learning with students becoming experts
in
several areas. |
3
Rating:
Uses coop-
erative learning with roles for students to become
experts. |
2
Rating:
Uses cooperative
learning with roles. |
1
Rating:
Uses teams. |
| Assessment methods
|
4
Rating:
Assessment
is integral to the classroom application as reflection for
students.
Uses rubrics to show the continuum that is
expected. |
3
Rating:
Begins
with revealing students theories about ESS. Reveals
changes
in students ESS thinking over several
activities. |
2
Rating:
Analyzes
pre and post knowledge of ESS and systems thinking through
activities. |
1
Rating:
Identifies
pre and post knowledge and skills. |
| Personal Reflection on what you have
learned
|
4 Rating:
A detailed comparison of your initial theories
with your current ones with an explanation of what caused the
evolution of your thinking. |
3 Rating:
A comparison of your initial theories from
Week A and your current theories with evidence to support your
current understanding. |
2 Rating:
An explanation of why you think your current
theory is more supportable than your original theory.
|
1 Rating:
A description of the ideas that support your
current theory. |